How UK universities briefed BAE Systems on pro-Palestine campus protests
Thirteen British universities have discussed how to handle pro-Palestine campus protests with the United Kingdomโs largest weapons manufacturer, including ramping up security at events and coordinatiโฆ
Thirteen British universities have discussed how to handle pro-Palestine campus protests with the United Kingdomโs largest weapons manufacturer, including ramping up security at events and coordinating responses to criticism.
The correspondence between universities and BAE Systems was uncovered in emails and internal documents obtained in a joint investigation by Liberty Investigates and Al Jazeera.
One United Nations expert said these disclosures suggest a โtroubling patternโ of universities taking โoperational cues and security strategies from weapons manufacturers to suppress their own studentsโ.
Among the institutions are the University of Manchester, the University of Nottingham, the University of Southampton, the University of Birmingham, the University of Strathclyde, and Cranfield University. Considered โstrategic partnersโ by BAE Systems, they collectively receive up to 15 million pounds ($20m) a year from the company under funding agreements.
In August 2024, BAE Systems appears to have encouraged the group of universities to develop a message โto counteract an often skewed, but prominent narrative from protestersโ on their partnerships, according to slides of a presentation titled โOn site protestsโ.
At that time, Israel had slaughtered more than 40,000 Palestinians, including 10,000 children in Gaza since October 2023. A national movement of students had been calling on their institutions to cut ties with the company, which makes equipment used by Israelโs military, among others they deemed complicit.
Following an October 2024 online careers event, during which protesting students posted messages such as โBAE kills kidsโ, an investigator at the University of Sheffield spoke to BAE Systems before deciding to discipline four people, according to internal correspondence.
The documents that Liberty Investigates and Al Jazeera have reviewed do not detail the content of the discussion, and the university has refused to respond to freedom of information (FOI) requests.
Read Full Story at Al Jazeera โ


